Sunday, September 02, 2007

Libertarian the new Conservative?

So I am scanning the headlines tonight and I see this article:

As Republican Hypocrisy Party Tanks, Conservatives Lean Libertarian

Yesterday, MSNBC news network, Chris Mattews introduced a daily newspaper editor from one of the "most conservative papers in America." She corrected him, saying their editorial page was conservative, and then corrected herself, saying "more Libertarian, really." It's another sign of the descent of the Republican party, when a staunch conservative paper disavows a connection to the party.

As the Republican party faces an almost daily onslaught of breaking news portraying its leaders as unethical, scandalous and incompetent, more and more Republicans and their supporters in the media-- anchors, pundits, commentators, even whole newspaper editorial departments, are characterizing themselves as Libertarian, as opposed to Republican.
It gets me thinking a bit, I am not sure how I feel about this group taking on the libertarian label as an effort to move away from the neo-conservatives recent bad publicity. Now I will be the first to admit that a staunch libertarian certainly shares some beliefs with a true conservative; smaller government, lower taxes, and support for state rights. However, the the conservative opinions around family values, defense spending and taking to the fight on the war on terror outside the territorial US differ significantly from my positions.

With Sleaze, Corruption and Scandal clouding the Republican party's image in america, this is bad news for the Christian right. Hypocrisy almost seems to be the mainstay of republican leaders.

It seems that in America, people are a lot more tolerant of one's sexual pecadillos than they are of hypocrisy. They'll tolerate a gay congressman, at least in and from some states, but not one who votes against gay rights while engaging in homosexual acts. Hypocrisy doesn't cut it.

It is also interesting as I have written in the past about the potential demise of the democratic party, becaues of their lack of organization perhaps we are actually watching the death of the GOP (which is an ironic name Grand Old Pary, since they have been around since 1856, while the Democrats essentially date back to the founding fathers). Perhaps all the work that Karl Rove has done to build the Republican party for the next 30 years, could ultimately wind up being the same thing that kills the entire party as they have lost touch with their base. I have always thought that the time was right for a 3rd party, perhaps I just had the wrong party going away.

I am salivating at the thought.
Last December, former Republican congressman and current critic of the Bush admin, Bob Barr became a Libertarian. On TV, we have Bill Maher, Lou Dobbs, TUcker Carlson, who have declared themselves not republican or democrat. I won't be surprised to see Joe Scarborough, who's been moving to the center on many issues, embracing Libertarianism... same with Chris Matthews.

It will be harder for already elected members of congress. But there could be a good that comes out of this. As more and more right wingers distance themselves from the current hypocrisy and scandal ridden current incarnation of the Republican party, they may find themselves unhappy with the current two party election system. If some influential pundits and politicians finally wake up and realize that the election system is broken and two party elections are a big part of the problem, then maybe instant run-off voting and equal treatment for third parties will become major issues that the most disliked congress in recent history will have to face.

Meanwhile, the Republican hypocrisy machine churns on. The dump Larry Craig in the flash of an eye, because a Republican Governor in Idaho can replace him with a Republican Senator. But David Vitter, caught in a relationship with a whore house gets a pass because he's in a state with a Democratic Governor. Now that Larry Craig has been pushed off the ledge by his party, the lamestream media should be boosting the Republican hypocrisy story on Vitter to their highest rotation. Why do they give him a pass. Tne news anchors should be asking all the Republcan leaders this question. We'll see, in a few hours, this Sunday morning, whether any of the sunday political shows do their jobs or prove they are part of the problem of the mainstream media.

2 comments:

Whit said...

I had a brief fling with the Libertarian party, but have been registered independent the majority of my life.

Although, when I turned 18 I registered Republican. My dad is a Republican and a politician and we were always doing dinners and such with the likes of Jim Kobe or whoever. It didn't take me long to switch once I was on my own.

I'm currently Democrat, but I have never been one to tow the party line. I just wanted to be clearly distant from the right and still have my vote, in theory, count for something.

Jeff Herz said...

Whit,

I too have been a non-affiliated registered voter since I move to CT 10 years ago. (there is an independent party, so you cannot register as an idependent). Although I am thoroughly in the libertarian camp, I have not felt it necessary to become a party member, since they have little or no influence locally.

Also, I receive less crappy junk mail as being a non-affiliated registered voter.

I also agree a citizen should not vote the party line, but rather have the strength and knowledge to vote their beliefs instead.

Thanks for the comment