Friday, November 23, 2007

High Crimes and Misdemeanors - Treason is not old news

I was not planning on writing much today, but then came across the article below from the Huffington Post.

I realize there is a large amount of bitterness and overall displeasure with the way their lives have been disrupted, but Valerie Plame-Wilson and Joseph Wilson make some very good points about how out of touch the main stream media seems to be and where there priorities seem to be in today's issues. It is a sad fact, that no one in Washington seems to be asking deep questions. The fact that have been a lot of shenanigans within this admnistration and a very low public approval rating, should be a perfect storm to sell a lot of newspapers by covering these types of issues. They ask two very good questions at the end of this piece,
Where is the outrage? Where is the "contempt and anger?"

But I guess I am just too idealistic at time to think other should feel the same

"I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious, of traitors." George Herbert Walker Bush, CIA dedication ceremony, April 26, 1999.

When Bush administration officials I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Karl Rove, Richard Armitage and Ari Fleischer betrayed Valerie Plame Wilson's identity as a covert CIA operations officer, they fell into the category of "the most insidious of traitors." Now we learn from the president's former press secretary, Scott McClellan, that the president himself "was involved" in sending him out to lie to the American public about the betrayal. If his direction to McClellan was deliberate and knowing, then the president was party to a conspiracy by senior administration officials to defraud the public. If that isn't a high crime and misdemeanor then we don't know what is. And if the president was merely an unwitting accomplice, then who lied to him? What is he doing to punish the person who misled the president to abuse his office? And why is that person still working in the executive branch? Special Prosecutor
Patrick Fitzgerald made clear his suspicions about the culprit when he said "a cloud remains over the office of the vice president." But we may never know exactly what happened because President Bush thwarted justice and guaranteed the success of the cover-up when he commuted Scooter Libby's felony sentence on four counts of lying, perjury and obstruction of justice.

With the exception of MSNBC's Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, and the intrepid David Shuster, the mainstream media would have you believe that McClellan's revelation is old news. "Now back to Aruba and the two-year old disappearance of a blond teenager." But treason is not old news. The Washington press corps, whose pretension is to report and interpret events objectively, has been compromised in this matter as evidence presented in the courtroom demonstrated. Prominent journalists acted as witting agents of Rove, Libby and Armitage and covered up this serious breach of U.S. national security rather than doing their duty as journalists to report it to the public.

So far there is no apparent desire for redemption driving the press to report on the treachery of senior officials. Instead, the mainstream press has compounded its complicity by giving the Bush administration yet another free pass and shifting blame. The New York Times failed to publish an article on McClellan's revelation and The Washington Post buried it at the end of a column deep on page A-15 in the newspaper. Earlier in the week, Newsweek magazine, owned by the Washington Post Company, proudly announced the identity of its new star columnist -- Karl Rove, one of the key actors in this collective treason. Robert Novak, who willfully disclosed Valerie's identity, having been twice warned not to do so by the CIA, and who transmitted his column to Rove before it was published, remains a regularly featured columnist in The Washington Post.

With nearly 70 percent of the public now believing that our country is on the wrong track, it is no wonder that many feel let down by major institutions, including the Washington press establishment that increasingly resembles the corrupt Soviet propaganda mill. One reporter from a major news organization even asked whether McClellan's statement wasn't just "another Wilson publicity stunt." Try following this tortuous logic: Dick Cheney runs an operation involving senior White House officials designed to betray the identity of a covert CIA officer and the press responds by trying to prove that the Wilsons are publicity seekers. What ever happened to reporting the news? Welcome to Through the Looking Glass.

Fearful of its access to the powerful, and defensive about its status in the high school social culture that permeates the capital of the Free World, much of the press has forgotten its responsibility to the public and the Constitution.

Presidents and those who aspired to be president in the past once took strong positions in defense of U.S. national security. Today, Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson has tried to build his support through fronting for the Scooter Libby Defense fundraising efforts. Meanwhile, other Republican candidates accuse Patrick Fitzgerald of being "a runaway prosecutor" and remain silent about the stain on Bush's presidency.

Where is the outrage? Where is the "contempt and anger?"

1 comment:

Jennifer Briney said...

The outrage, contempt, and anger are very much present, just not in the press. I think Valerie and Joe Wilson have raised the wrong question. It should be, "Who in the media is ensuring real stories are buried and that tainted journalists remain in their jobs and how do they benefit?"

The answer I think has to do with partnerships. CNN's debate tonight is being "sponsored" by the coal industry, for instance. But why is "sponsorship" even necessary? All they need is an auditorium, a few chairs, and a video camera. I'd love to know how much profit CNN is getting from the coal industry from this very simple production. I'd also love to know where that profit actually goes.

We all know about the agenda of Rupert Murdoch, and the sickening number of media outlets he has gotten his dirty fingers on, but what about the other owners? Who are these people? How do they benefit?

How do we take them down?

These are the real questions. Getting to the truth not only requires diligence in getting answers, but we need to ask the most productive questions. Isn't that the reason we're pissed at the media? Before we expect any big company to have a higher standard of journalistic integrity, we should be sure that we are clear on what we need to know.