Let me know what you think!!
I have this ongoing discussion with a longtime reader who also just so happens to be a longtime Oakland high school teacher, a wonderful guy who's seen generations of teens come and generations go and who has a delightful poetic sensibility and quirky outlook on his life and his family and his beloved teaching career.
And he often writes to me in response to something I might've written about the youth of today, anything where I comment on the various nefarious factors shaping their minds and their perspectives and whether or not, say, EMFs and junk food and cell phones are melting their brains and what can be done and just how bad it might all be.
His response: It is not bad at all. It's absolutely horrifying.
My friend often summarizes for me what he sees, firsthand, every day and every month, year in and year out, in his classroom. He speaks not merely of the sad decline in overall intellectual acumen among students over the years, not merely of the astonishing spread of lazy slackerhood, or the fact that cell phones and iPods and excess TV exposure are, absolutely and without reservation, short-circuiting the minds of the upcoming generations. Of this, he says, there is zero doubt.
Nor does he speak merely of the notion that kids these days are overprotected and wussified and don't spend enough time outdoors and don't get any real exercise and therefore can't, say, identify basic plants, or handle a tool, or build, well, anything at all. Again, these things are a given. Widely reported, tragically ignored, nothing new.
No, my friend takes it all a full step — or rather, leap — further. It is not merely a sad slide. It is not just a general dumbing down. It is far uglier than that.
We are, as far as urban public education is concerned, essentially at rock bottom. We are now at a point where we are essentially churning out ignorant teens who are becoming ignorant adults and society as a whole will pay dearly, very soon, and if you think the hordes of easily terrified, mindless fundamentalist evangelical Christian lemmings have been bad for the soul of this country, just wait.
It's gotten so bad that, as my friend nears retirement, he says he is very seriously considering moving out of the country so as to escape what he sees will be the surefire collapse of functioning American society in the next handful of years due to the absolutely irrefutable destruction, the shocking — and nearly hopeless — dumb-ification of the American brain. It is just that bad.
Now, you may think he's merely a curmudgeon, a tired old teacher who stopped caring long ago.
Not true. Teaching is his life. He says he loves his students, loves education and learning and watching young minds awaken. Problem is, he is seeing much less of it. It's a bit like the melting of the polar ice caps. Sure, there's been alarmist data about it for years, but until you see it for yourself, the deep visceral dread doesn't really hit home.
He cites studies, reports, hard data, from the appalling effects of television on child brain development (i.e.; any TV exposure before 6 years old and your kid's basic cognitive wiring and spatial perceptions are pretty much scrambled for life), to the fact that, because of all the insidious mandatory testing teachers are now forced to incorporate into the curriculum, of the 182 school days in a year, there are 110 when such testing is going on somewhere at Oakland High. As one of his colleagues put it, "It's like weighing a calf twice a day, but never feeding it."
But most of all, he simply observes his students, year to year, noting all the obvious evidence of teens' decreasing abilities when confronted with even the most basic intellectual tasks, from understanding simple history to working through moderately complex ideas to even (in a couple recent examples that particularly distressed him) being able to define the words "agriculture," or even "democracy." Not a single student could do it.
It gets worse. My friend cites the fact that, of the 6,000 high school students he estimates he's taught over the span of his career, only a small fraction now make it to his grade with a functioning understanding of written English. They do not know how to form a sentence. They cannot write an intelligible paragraph. Recently, after giving an assignment that required drawing lines, he realized that not a single student actually knew how to use a ruler.
It is, in short, nothing less than a tidal wave of dumb, with once-passionate, increasingly exasperated teachers like my friend nearly powerless to stop it. The worst part: It's not the kids' fault. They're merely the victims of a horribly failed educational system.
Then our discussion often turns to the meat of it, the bigger picture, the ugly and unavoidable truism about the lack of need among the government and the power elite in this nation to create a truly effective educational system, one that actually generates intelligent, thoughtful, articulate citizens.
Hell, why should they? After all, the dumber the populace, the easier it is to rule and control and launch unwinnable wars and pass laws telling them that sex is bad and TV is good and God knows all, so just pipe down and eat your Taco Bell Double-Supremo Burrito and be glad we don't arrest you for posting dirty pictures on your cute little blog.
This is about when I try to offer counterevidence, a bit of optimism. For one thing, I've argued generational relativity in this space before, suggesting maybe kids are no scarier or dumber or more dangerous than they've ever been, and that maybe some of the problem is merely the same old awkward generation gap, with every current generation absolutely convinced the subsequent one is terrifically stupid and malicious and will be the end of society as a whole. Just the way it always seems.
I also point out how, despite all the evidence of total public-education meltdown, I keep being surprised, keep hearing from/about teens and youth movements and actions that impress the hell out of me. Damn kids made the Internet what it is today, fer chrissakes. Revolutionized media. Broke all the rules. Still are.
Hell, some of the best designers, writers, artists, poets, chefs, and so on that I meet are in their early to mid-20s. And the nation's top universities are still managing, despite a factory-churning mentality, to crank out young minds of astonishing ability and acumen. How did these kids do it?
How did they escape the horrible public school system? How did they avoid the great dumbing down of America? Did they never see a TV show until they hit puberty? Were they all born and raised elsewhere, in India and Asia and Russia? Did they all go to Waldorf or Montessori and eat whole-grain breads and play with firecrackers and take long walks in wild nature? Are these kids flukes? Exceptions? Just lucky?
My friend would say, well, yes, that's precisely what most of them are. Lucky, wealthy, foreign-born, private-schooled ... and increasingly rare. Most affluent parents in America — and many more who aren't — now put their kids in private schools from day one, and the smart ones give their kids no TV and minimal junk food and no video games. (Of course, this in no way guarantees a smart, attuned kid, but compared to the odds of success in the public school system, it sure seems to help). This covers about, what, 3 percent of the populace?
As for the rest, well, the dystopian evidence seems overwhelming indeed, to the point where it might be no stretch at all to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low-level radiation or way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better.
What, too fatalistic? Don't worry. Soon enough, no one will know what the word even means.
4 comments:
If you take out the modern day references, i.e., Taco Bell, Ipod, Lindsay Lohan, et al.. This article could not be specifically dated within the past 50 years. What were you like as a teenager? Did you turn out like the majority declaration of your deeds? If I listened to all of the bottled hype like this I would not be the person I am today.
Context, perspective and statistical reference can be positioned to the end of either argument in this debate. I, for one, am optimistic about the future, Are you?
Eric,
Thank you for comment. I am not sure what to expect from the future at this point in time. I do believe we are living in a period of excess decadence where mediocrity is rewarded and exemplified. Maybe it is the same as 50 years ago, and I am just becomming a bitter old man before I turn 40.
However, I work with a lot of asian born people (chinese and indians primarily) who are brought up to believe that getting an education and trying to better one self through hard work. A few months back I posted two modern day pictures of college students, one from the Beijing University which could have been from the US in the 50's. All students were wearing suits and very serious faces. The other was from the University of Colorado and had naked woman and booze galore. Now I realize they were probably both taken out of context (and those who know me, know I drank my fair share in school), but the point is that students today (and even 20 years ago when I was in school) are more interested in partying, rather than really trying to better themselves while in school. Do you honestly think we can put a man on the moon today, when we can barely get a space shuttle up and back with any consistency?
This is not to say we dont have great minds, and we will continue to have great minds in this country. Those people will always succeed. But what about the above average or average student who with some proper incentive or motivation could do great things, rather than seeing that taking a test and acheiving mediocrity is concerned successful in our education system today.
From my perspective, it seems that my generation is slightly worse off than my parents generation. If the current education trends continue, with NCLB, a disenfranchised group of parents who see no value in educating their children, then my childrens generation will probably have a harder time keeping up with their parents or worse they will never even be able to acheive as much as their grandparents.
The question I ask is simple, how do we reverse this trend, so we can all be optimistic for the future. How we do get society to value education and hard work, rather than chasing a pipe dream of winning the lottery, being a pro ball player, or becoming the next hollywood fad?
I apologize for the lengthy response, it is my blog afterall, but you ask a very good question, that I felt deserved a thoughtful and complete response. Thank you again for the comment.
Jeff
Not lengthy at all Jeff... It is much easier to ask open ended questions in a short space, than to actually address them :)
You response does note a perspective that IS how the statistics are examined, i.e., Mediocre, average... I can see your point of worry and am cautious myself to display a sense of future knowledge. I do know that you make a sound point with respect to the educational system in the US and abroad. However, I wonder out loud, if the US system is so far out of step, why do so many foreign students yearn to become a part of the US University system.
The Thomas Friedman book, The World is Flat, takes a serious look at this question - from both a global perspective, as well as a local one from the author. He raises some of the same questions and notes some comments similar to your own. There is much more to the text than just education and if you have not read it, I suggest to... The entire text is very pertinent.
btw... I also may be becoming a bitter old man before I turn 40 and am just looking for unique artciles online to critique :) or maybe not...
Eric S.
Eric,
Thank you again for the comment.
I will look to pick up a copy of this book for review. Thanks for the suggestion on the reading material.
My only comment on the increased number of foreign students in our universities only says that for now, we still have a leg up on higher education. But the fact that more foreign students are taking the places of American born students should actually support my theory. Many of these foreigners do stay and work, but they either send money home to support family, or plan on staying here x period of time, until they have made a mark, then plan on returning to the home country. There is a knowledge drain which is going to effect this country in 10-20 years when all these folks decide that they can now take hte knowledge they have learned here and have the opportunity to apply to their home countries.
Meanwhile, we will have evolved more towards an idiocracy (see movie of same name) or if Jen Clark is correct, the neo-cons will have turned this country into a fascist regime instead as the masses expect and need the government to take care of them and protect them from the terrorist threat.
Thanks again for the comments, please keep them coming.
Jeff
Post a Comment