This is indefinite dictatorial power. And I don't use that term lightly; the very definition of a dictatorship is a system that puts a ruler above the law. In the weeks after 9/11, while America and the world were grieving, Bush built a legal rationale for a dictatorship. Then he immediately started using it to avoid the law.
This is not a partisan issue between Democrats and Republicans; it's a president unilaterally overriding the Fourth Amendment, Congress and the Supreme Court. Unchecked presidential power has nothing to do with how much you either love or hate George W. Bush. You have to imagine this power in the hands of the person you most don't want to see as president, whether it be Dick Cheney or Hillary Rodham Clinton, Michael Moore or Ann Coulter.
2 comments:
How very true, indeed. What's most frightening is how long opponents have allowed it to go unchecked.
Agreed. And it's not just the opposition that's let it go unchecked, it's the mainstream media as well. It's another black mark on the NY Times that they sat on the wiretapping story for a year. (At least the wound up running it the same day as the Patriot Act vote.) Thank goodness for the blogosphere.
The LA Times coverage of the White House defeat on the Patriot Act this week (woohoo!) gets it right:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-patriot22dec22,0,314184.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Post a Comment