Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Comments to the Stamford Board of Education on Security


Good evening Members of the Board of Education, Dr. Hamilton, (Mayor Pavia), 

I am sure you are just as moved, outraged and upset with the events that occurred in Newtown last month, right here in Fairfield County.  This tragic event has changed our outlook and priorities forcing us to review our safety and security position across the entire district.  It is unfortunate that an extreme situation such as this has moved this issue to the forefront of our current discussions.  However, we have to remember that this event while incredibly tragic, was virtually unstoppable.  We need to take into consideration the degree of preventability we can instill into our safety and security procedures, and determine what is truly feasible that is going to protect our students, teachers, staff, volunteers and administrators

Let’s remember, that this type of event is not isolated to schools or CT; they have occurred in a shopping mall in Tucson AZ, a movie Theatre in Aurora CO, and a College Campus in Blacksburg VA, as well as others that are unfortunately too numerous to mention here. 

First of all, I would like to thank Dr. Hamilton for acting quickly and decisively for hiring security guards for our elementary schools to begin immediately after the December Holiday Break.  I am sure she heard from multiple members of the community expressing the need for heightened security on all campuses.  I hope this quiets some of those immediate concerns.  This was originally proposed as a temporary situation, and I assumed until a more strategic approach could be formulated by this board, the police and other pertinent city officials over the next few months. 

Ken Trump – Pres National School Safety & Security Services said after Sandy Hook” “Fast” does not equate to “best. We do encourage school leaders to make informed, thoughtful decisions when selecting school security.”

Now, we have seen Dr. Hamilton recommend these positions become permanent in her 2013/2014 budget proposal.  These positions will be permanently added to the budget, a budget which just a few weeks before Newtown, I sat right here on the Citizens Budget Advisory Committee and spent multiple hours going through the budget line by line looking for any crevice of savings, any opportunity for additional efficiency to put more money into the classroom.  I walked away believing there was no additional savings to be had without significantly impacting our staff’s ability to teach our students.  Now, with a magnified spotlight on security we are proposing to just move a few items around, and we were able to generate $600k to fund these “security” positions next year, essentially removing valuable resources from the education line and moving them to security. 

I am very worried that if these positions are permanent, we the taxpayers will be burdened with this role for years to come without anyone even as much as doing a feasible study to determine is this really effective?  No one has even asked the question of what problem we are trying to solve!!  But adding additional non –educational permanent staff now seems like a necessity?

I do believe by adding unarmed “security guards” at the main entrance of our buildings will help standardize and streamline the building access procedures across the district, as per Dr. Hamiltons memo to SPS Families on 1/17/13.  It might also ease the burden and responsibility of the administrative staff in each building, freeing them to work on other tasks beyond monitoring the flow of traffic through the building.  But does it make our schools any safer?  Any more secure?

What is the liability that we are asking the city to take on  if one of our schools is targeted in the future and one of these unarmed security guards, perhaps we should say a potential sitting duck, is left with confronting an armed intruder more interested in shooting than talking?

The second question that arises, is what screenings have these security guards gone through?   These individuals were seemingly unemployed on 12/31.  Are they qualified to work with children?  Do they have sufficient mental screening?  How will their training correspond to the increased security standards that Dr. Hamilton is implementing across every campus. 

I am concerned that placing untrained, unscreened, unfinger printed individuals, who may or may not be qualified to work with children at the front door of our  buildings is much like the TSA screenings in airports, that is only window dressing to make us feel safer but does not actually address the issue of actually making the schools safer. There are reams of video on YouTube that show you how to get a gun onto a plane.   Making people feel safer is certainly half the battle, but there is no guarantee that the person who is charged with this duty will be in the right place at the right time, if god forbid any action is actually required.  I have asked friends from around the district to provide me feedback on their security guards, and the comments were not kind to say the least.  In lieu of time, I will email those comments to you after this meeting

Placing unarmed security guards is not an effective long term solution, which begs the question I asked earlier:  WHAT IS THE ISSUE WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE HERE?  If, if, if safety and security are now on the fore front of our priorities then we must ask ourselves what is going to make our schools, our students, our teachers, our administrators more safe and secure

What we must do is address the real long term concerns of our schools safety and security.  We must invest in improved systems that will provide real results, (adding bullet proof glass, reliable video systems, sophisticated security systems that will lock down buildings with one button, etc) that will add real long term value.  Any person (3rd party, teacher, or administrator) standing guard, armed or not, is just a fixed cost that makes us feel better, but will not really prevent the next tragedy. 

Regardless of the outcome on this issue, we must be cognizant of the fact that we don’t want to turn our buildings, our institutions of learning into prison states, where parents who have always provided their time to volunteer in the schools no longer feel welcome, intimidated by tactics to keep bad guys out, but in fact driving away our greatest resources away.   I have heard from a few people this weekend that some schools are cracking down even further, implementing new procedures that bar parents from volunteering in the room, and preventing them from attending class plays.  Keeping parents away will not help our schools.   Involved parents make better students. Turning parents away means disenfranchised Parents and less engaged kids, and that is not a formula for success

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

A few thoughts for Wednesday 1/16/13

In response to comparing Obama to Hitler

comparing any of our presidents (D or R) to Hitler is ridiculous.  Yes using children in political messaging is propaganda, but it has been down for ages and almost every politician across the spectrum has done it at some point.  We need to tone down the rhetoric and start discussing issues rather than just throwing flames over the walls at each other and demanding the other side to cave to our individual opinion.  This is not how any successful entity governs

In response to Government Conspiracy Theories

I am sure the gvt is capable of doing whatever they want (not sure how well they would actually pull it off, but that is another story). The question I have with this or any other gvt conspiracy is to what end? Why would the gvt stage an event like this to take away our guns? In today's age the guns we have (AR or not) is not going to protect us from tanks, planes, rpg and any other arsenal avail to our military. And if there was a conspiracy too many people would need to be involved and someone would get loose lips. Just does not pass the reality test to me


Thursday, January 10, 2013

The Baseball Problem

The problem is baseball laughed all the way to the bank during this era. The commissioner, the league, the teams, the players, the union, and the media all turned the other way and basked in the glory of the steroid. Now the writers have become sanctimonious assholes anointing themselves judge jury and executioners, essentially trying to erase any history of baseball from 1990-2005, of which they were equally culpable. What a bunch of hypocrites

Here is how Jason Stark sums it up perfectly:

The '90s happened. The first few years of the 21st century happened. I saw it with my very own eyeballs. So did you.  
It all happened, on the lush green fields of North America, as crowds roared and cash registers rung. It … all … happened. 
And how did it happen? The sport let it happen. That's how. 
Bud Selig let it happen. The union let it happen. The owners let it happen. The managers let it happen. The agents let it happen. The media let it happen. Front offices across the continent let it happen. And the players never stepped up to stop it from happening. 
It … all … happened. And no one in baseball has ever done anything, even after all these years, to make it un-happen, if you know what I mean. 
No records have been stripped. No championships have been stricken from anyone's permanent record. No numbers have been changed. No asterisks have been stamped in any record book. 
It … all … happened.

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

BoE Approves 8 unarmed guards for 12 Stamford elementary schools

From Stamford Advocate: "On Tuesday night, the Board of Education’s labor relations committee voted to hire eight security guards to provide an extra measure of safety at the city’s 12 elementary schools. The guards — who are unarmed — will be charged with watching the front doors to make sure they lock after visitors enter, signing in visitors, making sure outsiders are identified at all times and other gatekeeping functions."

How are 8 security guards going to be distributed across the 12 elementary schools? Seems like a 3/4 solution at best, assuming hiring unarmed guards makes the schools any safer (which I don't believe it does). Has any one of these guards currently posted in the schools been given a mental background screen? Are they physically fit? Are they qualified to be working with children?

Thursday, January 03, 2013

If I had my child to raise again...

JH Note - I know I am still raising my children, but trying to keep it in perspective

If I had my child to raise again...(Anonymous)
I'd build self-esteem first and the house later
I'd finger paint more and finger point less
I'd do less correcting and more connecting
I'd take my eyes off my watch and watch more with my eyes
I'd care to know less and know to care more
I'd take hikes and fly more kites
I'd stop playing seriously and seriously play
I would run through more fields and gaze at more stars
I'd do more hugging and less tugging.